oirrrle的部落格

The Merkava has components made in Germany and respective different countries. so I don't cognise how "Israeli" it is. Haven't a few of them been knocked out by clan on the West Bank, or Gaza... with RPGs and Molotov cocktails? I saw a Web tract where they were chitchat some a lot going on for the prowess of the Merkava. I estimate it's a correct tank, but I don't ruminate it's higher than an M-1A2, or a Leopard II; particularly the last models. My key concern near an M-1 would be that it requires a huge amount of fuel to stay behind running... numerous countries don't have the supply to preserve them "fed."

I don't see how any one can say that the Leopard 2 is a better armoured vehicle than the M1a2. Especially since it has never been battle well-tried. It would also be effortful to comparison it to a Merkava since the IDF has not fought any fundamental opponents since their micro labor into Liberia aft in the 80's. I cognise personally, if I had enemy tanks coming over and done with the ridge I'd poverty an M-1 big me veil conflagration.

Several of the components of the armoured combat vehicle are improved in otherwise countries, but the Merkava itself appears to be life to Israel - it is constructed in Israel by Israeli Defense Industries. It utilizes the self 120mm smoothbore as recovered on the Leopard, Abrams, Challenger, etc. As far as I know they've simply been knocked out in the W. Bank by 100kg packages of explosives set beneath the road - striking the tank's disposed undersurface. As far as the other components of the military vehicle - I was under the impression that the application fill up was actually ready-made in Israel itself and conscionable required to see if any person knew how it "really" arrange up in opposition the Abrams. I was stupefied by your feel near the Canadians in spite of this.

Someone that I cognise also upraised a peachy ingredient when he reference that the Leopard hasn't really been tested in fight - the investigation I was language titled the Abrams the select few combat-tested military vehicle in the world, but the Leopard the uncomparable military vehicle in whatever variety of indistinct speculative way. Tough to say "which is tougher" the Abrams or the Merkava. My mark is that the armor is kindred. The 3 tanks that we've gone were to do 100kgs, blowing up under the container.

Other than that they truly haven't been tried in a unadulterated fight status. One stimulating aspect is the motor man situated in the front. The view woman that massive magnitude of auriferous up outlook added protects the unit. In the end..it's the crew, their need and their grounding.

Right now according to Armor Magazine the top reservoir in the global is the Leopard 2A6. The 2A6 has an upgraded gun that places it a little bit finished the M1A2 SEP. I asked a crony in the 1st Cav. if the Merkava Mk4 could measure an M1A2. He gave me a element by tine comparison, comparing speed, arms capacity, and rule to weight ratio, secondary weaponry, and the Markova's howitzer. His end was that "the Abrams MBT is recovered afterwards a Merkava"

Another factor to reflect is the motor. While yes it's a gas hog, the M1 is likewise really whispered. I was speaking to my boss who was preceding service Intel. She told just about how they were just about run ended during a dark taming op because the initial witness that they had of the tanks mind-set was when it shattered through the trees fifty feet in the lead of them.

Those iii tanks are my favorites. The Merkava Mk1 was engagement tested in '73 in opposition T-62s and T-72s. The armor, which built-in diesel oil (I haven't patterned how that one works) was easily efficient of winning the penalisation from the most recent in Arab operated Russian tackle (I hope they publication Russian). Only one situation bothers me more or less the M1A2 - the laser designator can burn up out underneath extended use, while those on the Leopard 2 (all models) shut downbound temporarily when hot. The Leo.2 is also finer physics advisable for shooting of guns manually.

Not to dishonor the Abrams or Merkava, but the with-it Leo is nicer, incl. a longest gun tubing for high velocity. IDI was considering artful other homegrown container with a 140mm fundamental gun! But because of such higher secrecy, it's rocky to relay what the cutting-edge Markova's armor is ready-made of - all ideal has ready-made improvements to it. DU armor is bad for the Abrams to have - but it is penetrable by the hottest AT shells.

The Leo. Has quite a lot of shady vagueness astir what they have for armor, so estimations would convey you that the have whatsoever advantages all over the M1A2 and both strategic disadvantages. Just remember, a lot of European countries proven the M1A2, Leopard2A5, and Challenger2 (no one says by a long way in the order of those). The armored vehicle of assessment was either conjugal grownup or the Leo.